Art report. Vicky Liu. The Whistlers

Immediate Response

The Whistlers, which is a sculpture by Tip Toland in 2005, leads me not only to see the beauty of old women but also to think about the deeper meaning hidden in details. When I first saw the sculpture, I was shocked by Tip Toland’s choice of representation, which are old women. Different from sculptures I used to see, which always represent the perfect body shape of young men and women, their “imperfect” old bodies and faces make me feel confused. I noticed the old women’s mouths first, which curled up in a similar wired way. The whole piece scared me at first, but it also put me in awe of life.

Objective Description

The whole sculpture is made up of two twin figures of naked old women facing each other. Both of them have obvious signs of old age. For example, short black and white hair, wrinkles on the face, sagging breasts and shriveled skin. Their actions and expressions are weird, too. The one on the left with front hair bent her back and raised her left hand. She put her right hand on the table with two fingers together pointing to the right. Her eyes were wide and her mouth curled up as if to speak. The left woman has almost the same expression as the woman on the right as if she were imitating her. Both her hands were at her waist, and her posture was a little bit awkward.

Technical Decisions

Two similar sculptures of old women facing each other, which gives viewers a feeling that the two women are communicating, makes me think deeper about the meaning of the sculpture. The interaction between two old people seems innocent. It was as if the old woman on the left was teaching the one on the right to whistle. Even though both of the old women have mature and old bodies, which even are awkward to move, their faces have childlike innocence and simplicity. The material of this sculpture is stoneware. It’s a hard, opaque, vitrified ceramic ware. It represents how old people’s skin looks perfectly. The movement of two old women is somewhere between harmonic and dissonant. Even though the author shows the detail of muscle, the fact that the characters are old and weak makes the whole piece more peaceful.

The work in the world

The Whistlers, like most of other works of Tip Toland, shows the image of the old. Tip Toland uses paint, encaustic technique and hair to create figures with uncanny skin quality, utterly convincing hand gestures and eerily spontaneous facial expressions”.(Wikipedia) Tip Toland’s figurative sculptures are stunningly realistic and exquisite. Tantrum, one of her other works, describes the artist’s sane response to an insane world. Beauty Parlor, is about parents willingly being made the fools out of love for their children. Fool, is a portrait of the artist herself as a contemporary fool.  Most of her works are about the elderly and children because they are too often weak and neglected. The feelings imparted by her sculptures make the viewer feel the same feelings in his or her life and elicit an emotional and empathetic response.

The story it tells

Tip Toland’s works have brought the form of sculpture of the elderly into people’s aesthetics. They remind us to see the waning beauty of life, to be moved by the fragility and innocence of human beings. They separate us from a single aesthetic and teach us to see a beautiful and good soul in decrepit bodies. In Tip Toland’s work, old age and innocence, destruction and rebirth were perfectly fused together. People are inspired to pay more attention and show more respect to the old and find a wider explanation of art.

Carter alvord- Poteous

I really enjoyed the documentary because the narrator talked about both science and art. Immediately, I began to think about a voyager, Christopher Columbus, who sketched many of his findings down in his personal journal. As he traveled to North America, he would sketch birds, rocks, shells, and almost any new species which he had not seen before. While his drawings purpose were for scientific purposes, I would still describe them as pieces of art. Without skillfully depicting and drawing each animal and organism adroitly, it would be hard for others to comprehend what the animals purpose was. Furthermore, I found Haeckel’s life story to be extremely intriguing. His battle between matter and religion was quite interesting. Moreover, I found the narrators description of society’s perception of sciences, and how Haeckel changed peoples perception of the world, and, in specific, water to be fascinating. Overall, I found the documentary exceedingly alluring and I enjoyed learning about how Haeckel used art to bring his scientific discoveries to life. 

Carter Alvord- untitled sculpture piece

Tony Cragg

Immediate Response:

I find this sculpture to be extremely unorganized. It seems to be extremely sporadic and there is no certainty to its pattern. However, while the piece is chaotic, the materials used, and the way it’s sculpted, makes it exceedingly satisfying to view. In certain areas, the piece becomes narrow, while at other sections, it becomes very large and almost spherical. The piece, made out of stainless steel, almost looks to be made out of different slabs molded together in no specific order.

Objective Description:

First, I see a large steel structure. At the base, it starts in a small cylinder, until slowly shifting off to the right. Once it branches off to the right, it becomes almost like a small skipping stone that you would throw across the water. From there, it moves back to the left, with the same skipping stone shape. Then, for the majority of the sculpture it stays with an unpredictable pattern going back and forth until reaching it’s peak where it creates an awkward spherical shape. Overall, the sculpture, while sporadic, is extremely smooth and interesting to look at.

Technical Decisions:

the composition of this piece created by Tony Cragg is exceptionally dynamic. When starting from the base pedestal of the sculpture and moving upwards, your eyes sway back and forth as you follow the intrigue and almost unthought out path that Cragg has chosen to make. As a viewer, it keeps you both intrigued and entertained by the unruly path that the sculpture takes.

The work in the World:

In my opinion, this sculpture, which was entirely crafted out of steel, intrigues any veiwer. In turn, all of Cragg’s artwork uses one core medium. For some, the artist uses wood, plastic, or even Plexiglass to create extremely vivid and dynamic images. I feel as if Cragg likes the simplicity of single material sculptures because they don’t distract the viewer from the actual artwork being presented.

The Story It Tells:

I feel as if Cragg yearns to illustrate the unpredictable nature of life. Like his sculpture, life is remarkably erratic, and no matter what, you never know what may come your way. As you grow, there are sure to be bumps and obstacles along the way in which you must surpass. I feel as if Craggs dynamic and chaotic sculpture helps present that nothing is garuanteed.

To Twine, Janine Antoni

To Twine by Janine Antoni

Immediate Response:

              When I first saw the sculpture to twine by Janine Antoni it was hard not to notice the complexity of the two spines woven together but together with the simplicity of the wall behind it and the setting it is on.  When seeing the piece, it made me think of marriage.  Marriage is the connection of two people intertwining their life together and connected the balance of the complexity and simplicity that marriage can be. 

Objective Description:

              This piece is made of two human spines intertwined together like two snakes would intertwine with each other.  It is set on a cream carpet with a white background.   The spines are very complex in nature and the sculpture shows that by showing where each disk would be and having the spines connect in the disks at the bottom end of the piece.

Technical Decisions:

              The presentation of the sculpture sits on a white carpet in a bland white room.  I believe that the specific method of Antoni presenting the sculpture like this is to strictly have the viewer focus on the two spines intertwined with each other but to also have the artist see the simplicity surrounding the complexity of the sculpture.  I believe that “to twine’s composition is static in nature.  The composition being static in nature impacted me as a viewer by having me directly focus on the two spines intertwined when first looking at the sculpture and strictly focusing on the beauty of it.    

The Work in the World:

              The only item in this sculpture is two spines.  The association with the world that these two spines would have is that the spine is the backbone of every person in the world.  The two spines coming together shows that people of the world can come together.  The artwork relates with history because since the beginning of time people have always been mistreated and the artwork associates with the movement to put that behind and try and have everyone love each other and come together.       

The Story it Tells:

              The meaning of this sculpture is to show people that the world can run better and be much simpler if we came together in either marriage that correlates with my initial thoughts on the work and coming together as a world and loving each other.  I arrived at these interpretations of the work because I believe that the white walls and white carpet are signs of simplicity and that the two spines coming together can be many people coming together.  People could interpret this work as two people who were lost in the world coming together and living through the mess we call life together.    

Nolan Springer

The film on radiolarians and Ernst Haeckel was very interesting. I enjoyed it and even learned some pretty cool facts. Radiolarians are part of the oceanic plankton. They are also over 500 million years old. Some cool things I found out about Haeckel’s work is that he had the theory way before Darwin that man came from ape. I also found it interesting that he enjoyed painting pictures of landscapes, especially rock forms. This film definitely made me think differently about the art and science relationship because if Haeckel wasn’t able to draw those images, who knows what would have happened.One major historical issue was Haeckel’s stem tree. He made a racial tree that put minorities at the bottom, with white people at the top. Doing some further digging, people believe his words may have helped with the Nazi’s rise. In today’s world, everyone knows that that was such a horrible thing to do. But to only single him out would be crazy. Many people back in his day believed these same things. You just wish that what everyone knows today would’ve been taught back then. You could argue that if this didn’t happen, Haeckel wouldn’t be known as he is today. Some issues that could come up are we don’t know just how accurate these drawings from hundreds of years ago truly are. Another obstacle is that he drew them in 2D. For our sculptures, we have to bring the object to life and make our best guesses as to how they would have looked. The thing I found the most interesting was the fact that they stumbled upon the organisms at the bottom of the Ocean. Crazy to think how big of a discovery that was, and makes you think what else has been discovered by being in the right place at the right time. 

Jack Greene

  1. A radiolarian is a series of concentric shells connected in a single crystal web. It’s a microscopic image of a single celled organism.
  2. I was interested in his work because he was curious about one thing and it became a live obsession to keep studying these cells and make them into art that he loved.
  3. This film made me think about how the relationship between arts and science is closer than we think. Art is everywhere, especially in nature. Haeckel worked in combining the two of them together to make his unique art.
  4. An issue that I found interesting had to do with the Mariner ship. The weather and nature had a big influence on the ship’s travels. When things would start to look down there would be storms and creatures in the waters. Soon once the storms pass the rain would come and they would get a shot at redemption.
  5. A conceptual implication when making a radiolarian from Haeckel’s drawings would be to take that 2D drawing and turn it into a 3D sculpture. You have to think about what it would look like in real life to get an understanding on. how you want your sculpture to come out. That can also be very challenging because you never really know how it’s going to turn out, you need a lot of practice.

Qian Qian Mei – Project 5, Nature Sculpture

This piece is called simply “Tree”, resembling a Christmas tree. I know we haven’t even reached Thanksgiving yet, but the joy and excitement surrounding the holidays is beginning and I can not wait until December. I also strongly believe that Christmas music is acceptable any time of the year and that Justin Bieber’s Christmas album is probably his best album.

Meshmixer Project – Scott

Love:

  1. Food
  2. Traveling
  3. Friends
  4. Family
  5. Video Games
  6. Weekends
  7. Lizards
  8. My pets
  9. My home/hometown
  10. Water Polo

Hate:

  1. Mushrooms
  2. Being too hot
  3. Having too much work & not enough time
  4. Shows that end poorly
  5. Feeling frustrated
  6. Being sick
  7. Getting a bad grade
  8. Inconsiderate people
  9. Corruption
  10. Losing

Fear

  1. Spiders
  2. Losing people that I love
  3. Freak accidents
  4. Global warming
  5. Not succeeding
  6. Getting old
  7. Rejection
  8. Getting lost in a forest
  9. Covid-19
  10. Natural disasters

Meshmixer Project Prep – Elizabeth

Hate:

  • Seafood
  • Truffle smell
  • Itchy sweaters
  • The cold
  • Mosquitos
  • Waiting rooms
  • Donald Trump
  • Running
  • A dirty house
  • Golf

Love:

  • Australia
  • My dog
  • Tea
  • Scott
  • Lana Del Rey
  • Reading
  • Manicures
  • Baths
  • Garlic
  • My family

Fear:

  • Butterflies
  • Tsunamis
  • Loneliness
  • The dark
  • Human trafficking
  • Spiders
  • Bungee jumping
  • My parents dying
  • COVID-19
  • Donald Trump

Proteus Response

The biggest thing I learned about radiolarians that I did not realize, is that they are small, single-celled organisms. A you must look through a microscope to see them. I imagined them as the size of a coral or starfish. I also thought of them as organisms that lived in the distant past, but some are still alive today. The aspect of Haeckel’s life and work that interested me the most was the fact that he went on sea voyages. It is hard to imagine in the modern day long sea voyages where the only form of calculating direction was with a map, a compass, and the stars, where the only communication home was through letters. I enjoyed his letters during that time period. You could really feel how much he was learning and enjoyed that learning. This film made me realize that often the line between art and science is often very blurry. Science is often an art, especially when drawing or modeling such complex forms. Art is a science. It is precise, and accurate when it represents something living or extinct. I relate to Haeckel in that he enjoyed art so much he almost quit science, but found a way to incorporate one passion into the other. An implication from sculpting based off of Haeckle’s drawings is the layers of unconscious subjectiveness- the viewer’s perspective. Haeckel drew based off of what he could see through the microscope. He may have taken some artist liberties or perhaps his perception of a specimen, due to bias etc, was not always 100% accurate. We are then taking our perspective based off of his and creating something. It is like a game of telephone, eventually the original message, or in this case a true skeleton of a radiolarian, gets distorted. Overall, the most thought provoking part of Proteus was when they were narrating Haeckle’s letters, they put the view of the film in his, so that you could be in his shoes, where he was, how he felt, and was thinking, while he was talking. 

test

What is Lorem Ipsum?

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry’s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.

Why do we use it?

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using ‘Content here, content here’, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for ‘lorem ipsum’ will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).

Where does it come from?

Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source. Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of “de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum” (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..”, comes from a line in section 1.10.32.

The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from “de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum” by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.

Where can I get some?

There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which don’t look even slightly believable. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn’t anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary, making this the first true generator on the Internet. It uses a dictionary of over 200 Latin words, combined with a handful of model sentence structures, to generate Lorem Ipsum which looks reasonable. The generated Lorem Ipsum is therefore always free from repetition, injected humour, or non-characteristic words etc.

paragraphswordsbyteslistsStart with ‘Lorem
ipsum dolor sit amet…’